Jing Weiyi

Attorney Jing Weiyi once worked at the city detention center, combining his experience as a police officer with professional legal expertise. He has devoted himself to the field of land expropriation and demolition legal services, handling cases covering all core scenarios of demolition protection, including but not limited to: collective land expropriation, state-owned land housing expropriation, group demolition disputes, as well as urban village renovation, shantytown transformation, and regional relocation projects related to people's livelihood. He is also skilled in negotiating compensation for factory and enterprise demolitions, protecting the rights and interests of livestock farms during relocation, and avoiding legal risks in factory and enterprise upgrading projects.   Throughout his practice, Attorney Jing Weiyi has always adhered to two core principles: First, "act with integrity and dedication," handling every case with rigorous responsibility, from case analysis and evidence collection to negotiation and litigation representation, ensuring clients control legal risks and secure legitimate rights throughout the entire process. Second, "fight for the rights of the demolished," always standing on the side of the demolished to accurately address issues such as unreasonable compensation and illegal procedures in demolition. With his solid legal foundation and rich practical experience, he has helped clients safeguard their property rights, earning deep trust and consistent recognition from clients.

Some successful cases:

1. The case of state-owned land expropriation for the high-speed rail station construction project in Xishan District, Kunming, Yunnan Province: The first-instance court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding the expropriation decision illegal. An equal communication platform was established, and the compensation amount has now been raised to 14 million yuan.

2. Case of the Nanyuan Sub-district Office of Jianye District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province illegally demolishing the buildings of the parties involved: The first-instance judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, confirming that the defendant violated the law and helped the parties recover the loss of 400,000 yuan.

3. Case of illegal land occupation and construction on contracted land in Setuo Village, Guanyinqiao Town, Jinchuan County, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province: By obtaining key evidence through administrative reconsideration, the client's land compensation and resettlement fees were significantly increased through negotiations.

4. The case of illegal occupation of collective land in Yuanzhuang Village, Fenyang City, Luliang City, Shanxi Province: The land involved in the case covers more than 700 mu. Through administrative reconsideration, it was confirmed that the land occupation was illegal. Through litigation procedures, it was confirmed that the compensation and resettlement were not implemented in accordance with the law. At present, the compensation amount has been raised from 300 yuan per mu to 2,000 yuan per mu.

5. Case of illegal occupation of collective land and insufficient land expropriation compensation in Wuli Villa Village, Ganma Town, Ganyu District, Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province: By collecting key evidence and addressing the client's actual situation, we sent several letters to achieve effective communication. Through administrative reconsideration, we confirmed that the building procedures for some of the client's land were illegal, gaining the initiative in negotiations. In the lawsuit against illegal land occupation, we used the opportunity of litigation to conduct several effective communications and consultations between the two parties, eventually signing a land expropriation and resettlement compensation agreement, and meeting the client's reasonable demands.

6. Five households in Lu Bei Village, Gusu District, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, including Wang * and others, entrusted their legal representatives to handle the expropriation of their houses and land. After the agency, they applied for administrative reconsideration and requested a hearing from the Jiangsu Provincial Government. In the end, the provincial government made an administrative reconsideration decision, legally confirming that the approval of the provincial government to the city government's use of the villagers' land in the approval issued by the Provincial Land and Resources Bureau was illegal, and fully safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of the clients.

7. The case of illegal land expropriation and compensation in Tan Village, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province: More than 300 households in the village entrusted lawyers to handle the case. Through legal actions such as applying for administrative information disclosure, appealing for administrative reconsideration, and applying for personal and property protection, they successfully stopped the demolition of their houses, won time for negotiations, and increased their bargaining power by collecting key evidence. As a result, the resettlement and compensation fees were significantly increased, and the legitimate rights and interests of the entrusted parties were fully protected.